Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
31 kcal
Score
78 / 100
Chaga Mantarı has a higher nutrition quality score (80) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
204 vs 31(-84.8%)
Score Diff
80 vs 78(-2.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Chaga Mantarı
Higher energy
Chaga Mantarı
Score leader
Chaga Mantarı
Nutrient split
18 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Chaga Mantarı and Maitake Mantarı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Chaga Mantarı has 204.0 kcal and Maitake Mantarı has 31.0 kcal. The difference is 173.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 80 and 78. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Chaga Mantarı | Maitake Mantarı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.18 mg | 0.158 mg | -12.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.52 mg | 0.242 mg | -53.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.056 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.94 mg | 0.252 mg | -73.2% |
| Beta-glukan | 16.8 g | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 28.1 µg | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 1124 iu | — |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | 4.8 µg | 28.1 µg | +485.4% |
| Demir | 12.4 mg | 0.3 mg | -97.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 56.2 g | 2.7 g | -95.2% |
| Ergosterol | 340 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 21 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 92 mg | 74 mg | -19.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 195 mg | 1 mg | -99.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68.4 g | 6.97 g | -89.8% |
| Kül | 8.1 g | 0.53 g | -93.5% |
| Magnezyum | 135 mg | 10 mg | -92.6% |
| Mangan | 15.6 mg | 0.059 mg | -99.6% |
| Niasin | 5.4 mg | 6.585 mg | +21.9% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.2 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 2840 mg | 204 mg | -92.8% |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 1.94 g | -50.3% |
| Selenyum | 14.5 µg | 2.2 µg | -84.8% |
| Sodyum | 18 mg | 1 mg | -94.4% |
| Su | 10.2 g | 90.37 g | +786.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.35 g | 0.038 g | -89.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.3 g | 0.19 g | -85.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.082 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.6 g | 2.07 g | +245.0% |
| Çinko | 6.8 mg | 0.76 mg | -88.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Chaga Mantarı and Maitake Mantarı.
Maitake Mantarı has less energy per 100 g (31 kcal versus 204 kcal).
For measured Su, Chaga Mantarı has 10.2 g and Maitake Mantarı has 90.37 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Chaga Mantarı 80, Maitake Mantarı 78.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.