Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
33 kcal
Score
93 / 100
İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) has a higher nutrition quality score (93) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
204 vs 33(-83.8%)
Score Diff
80 vs 93(+16.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak)
Higher energy
Chaga Mantarı
Score leader
İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak)
Nutrient split
17 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Chaga Mantarı and İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Chaga Mantarı has 204.0 kcal and İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) has 33.0 kcal. The difference is 171.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 80 and 93. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Chaga Mantarı | İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.18 mg | 0.125 mg | -30.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.52 mg | 0.349 mg | -32.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.11 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.94 mg | 0.244 mg | -74.0% |
| Beta-glukan | 16.8 g | 0.48 g | -97.1% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.7 µg | — |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | 4.8 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 12.4 mg | 1.33 mg | -89.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 56.2 g | 2.3 g | -95.9% |
| Ergosterol | 340 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 38 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 92 mg | 120 mg | +30.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 195 mg | 18 mg | -90.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68.4 g | 6.09 g | -91.1% |
| Kül | 8.1 g | 1.01 g | -87.5% |
| Magnezyum | 135 mg | 18 mg | -86.7% |
| Mangan | 15.6 mg | 0.113 mg | -99.3% |
| Niasin | 5.4 mg | 4.96 mg | -8.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.2 mg | 1.29 mg | +7.5% |
| Potasyum | 2840 mg | 420 mg | -85.2% |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 3.31 g | -15.1% |
| Selenyum | 14.5 µg | 2.6 µg | -82.1% |
| Sodyum | 18 mg | 18 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 10.2 g | 89.18 g | +774.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.35 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.3 g | 0.41 g | -68.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.6 g | 1.11 g | +85.0% |
| Çinko | 6.8 mg | 0.77 mg | -88.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Chaga Mantarı and İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak).
İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) has less energy per 100 g (33 kcal versus 204 kcal).
For measured Su, Chaga Mantarı has 10.2 g and İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) has 89.18 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Chaga Mantarı 80, İstiridye Mantarı (Kavak) 93.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.