Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
579 kcal
Score
23 / 100
Badem (Kavrulmamış) has a higher nutrition quality score (23) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
654 vs 579(-11.5%)
Score Diff
15 vs 23(+53.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Badem (Kavrulmamış)
Higher energy
Ceviz İçi
Score leader
Badem (Kavrulmamış)
Nutrient split
6 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ceviz İçi and Badem (Kavrulmamış) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ceviz İçi has 654.0 kcal and Badem (Kavrulmamış) has 579.0 kcal. The difference is 75.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 15 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ceviz İçi | Badem (Kavrulmamış) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.34 mg | 0.205 mg | -39.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.15 mg | 1.138 mg | +658.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.54 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 1.59 mg | 1.031 mg | -35.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.3 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 2.91 mg | 3.71 mg | +27.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 12.5 g | +86.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.7 mg | 25.63 mg | +3561.4% |
| Folat DFE | 98 µg | 44 µg | -55.1% |
| Fosfor | 346 mg | 481 mg | +39.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 98 mg | 269 mg | +174.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.71 g | 21.55 g | +57.2% |
| Magnezyum | 158 mg | 270 mg | +70.9% |
| Mangan | 3.41 mg | 2.179 mg | -36.1% |
| Niasin | 1.12 mg | 3.618 mg | +223.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.57 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 441 mg | 733 mg | +66.2% |
| Protein | 15.23 g | 21.15 g | +38.9% |
| Selenyum | 4.9 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 1 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 4.07 g | 4.41 g | +8.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 3.802 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 31.551 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 65.21 g | 49.93 g | -23.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 12.329 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 4.35 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.09 mg | 3.12 mg | +1.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ceviz İçi and Badem (Kavrulmamış).
Badem (Kavrulmamış) has less energy per 100 g (579 kcal versus 654 kcal).
For measured E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol), Ceviz İçi has 0.7 mg and Badem (Kavrulmamış) has 25.63 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ceviz İçi 15, Badem (Kavrulmamış) 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.