Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
77 / 100
Çemen otu yaprağı has a higher nutrition quality score (88) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
49 vs 282(+475.5%)
Score Diff
88 vs 77(-12.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Çemen otu yaprağı
Higher energy
Aleppo biberi
Score leader
Çemen otu yaprağı
Nutrient split
2 - 17 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çemen otu yaprağı and Aleppo biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çemen otu yaprağı has 49.0 kcal and Aleppo biberi has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 233.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 88 and 77. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çemen otu yaprağı | Aleppo biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 215 µg | 1480 µg | +588.4% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.3 mg | +500.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.31 mg | 0.9 mg | +190.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | 2.1 mg | +1650.0% |
| Bakir | 0.18 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 2580 µg | 17000 µg | +558.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 52 mg | 75 mg | +44.2% |
| Demir | 3.2 mg | 14.5 mg | +353.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.5 g | 27.2 g | +988.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 28 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 51 mg | 290 mg | +468.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 160 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 395 mg | 148 mg | -62.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6 g | 52 g | +766.7% |
| Kül | 1.5 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 54 mg | 152 mg | +181.5% |
| Niasin | 0.85 mg | 8.7 mg | +923.5% |
| Potasyum | 380 mg | 1950 mg | +413.2% |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 12 g | +172.7% |
| Sodyum | 42 mg | 1600 mg | +3709.5% |
| Su | 86.2 g | 10.5 g | -87.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 84 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.9 g | 10 g | +1011.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 10.3 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.42 mg | 2.4 mg | +471.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çemen otu yaprağı and Aleppo biberi.
Çemen otu yaprağı has less energy per 100 g (49 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Çemen otu yaprağı has 42 mg and Aleppo biberi has 1600 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çemen otu yaprağı 88, Aleppo biberi 77.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.