Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
373 kcal
Score
43 / 100
Çemen Otu Tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (51) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
323 vs 373(+15.5%)
Score Diff
51 vs 43(-15.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Çemen Otu Tohumu
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Çemen Otu Tohumu
Nutrient split
11 - 8 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çemen Otu Tohumu and Achiote are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çemen Otu Tohumu has 323.0 kcal and Achiote has 373.0 kcal. The difference is 50.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 51 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çemen Otu Tohumu | Achiote | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 60 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 100 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.322 mg | 0.25 mg | -22.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.366 mg | 0.4 mg | +9.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.6 mg | 0.35 mg | -41.7% |
| Bakir | 1.11 mg | 0.5 mg | -55.0% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1200 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3 mg | 2 mg | -33.3% |
| Demir | 33.53 mg | 6.5 mg | -80.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 24.6 g | 16.5 g | -32.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.5 mg | — |
| Enerji | 1351 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 373 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 120 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 296 mg | 250 mg | -15.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 176 mg | 355 mg | +101.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 58.35 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 60.3 g | — |
| Kül | 3.4 g | 6.48 g | +90.6% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 50 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 191 mg | 280 mg | +46.6% |
| Mangan | 1.23 mg | 1.5 mg | +22.0% |
| Niasin | 1.64 mg | 3 mg | +82.9% |
| Potasyum | 770 mg | 1250 mg | +62.3% |
| Protein | 23 g | 12.86 g | -44.1% |
| Selenyum | 6.3 µg | 5 µg | -20.6% |
| Sodyum | 67 mg | 20 mg | -70.1% |
| Su | 8.84 g | 8 g | -9.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.46 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 57 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.41 g | 12.36 g | +92.8% |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 2.5 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çemen Otu Tohumu and Achiote.
Çemen Otu Tohumu has less energy per 100 g (323 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Çemen Otu Tohumu has 176 mg and Achiote has 355 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çemen Otu Tohumu 51, Achiote 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.