Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
129 kcal
Score
26 / 100
Biftek Teriyaki has a higher nutrition quality score (54) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
198 vs 129(-34.8%)
Score Diff
54 vs 26(-51.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biftek Teriyaki
Higher energy
Biftek Teriyaki
Score leader
Biftek Teriyaki
Nutrient split
29 - 21 (tie: 15)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Biftek Teriyaki and Kung Pao Tavuk are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Biftek Teriyaki has 198.0 kcal and Kung Pao Tavuk has 129.0 kcal. The difference is 69.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 54 and 26. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Biftek Teriyaki | Kung Pao Tavuk | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 65 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 341 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.07 mg | 0.03 mg | -57.1% |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.57 µg | 0.11 µg | -93.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.16 mg | 0.06 mg | -62.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.38 mg | 0.24 mg | -36.8% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.07 mg | -12.5% |
| Besin folati | 10 µg | 16 µg | +60.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 601 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 16 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 7.1 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 2.53 mg | 0.76 mg | -70.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 1.5 g | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.39 mg | 1.02 mg | +161.5% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 198 kj | 129 kj | -34.8% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 10 µg | 16 µg | +60.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 196 mg | 94 mg | -52.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.4 µg | 13.6 µg | +871.4% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 10 mg | 20 mg | +100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.94 g | 6.87 g | +254.1% |
| Kolesterol | 82 mg | 26 mg | -68.3% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 226 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 26 mg | 24 mg | -7.7% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.35 g | 0.08 g | -77.1% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 3.16 g | 2.04 g | -35.4% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.04 g | +300.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 5.07 mg | 2.76 mg | -45.6% |
| Potasyum | 259 mg | 218 mg | -15.8% |
| Protein | 28.86 g | 9.76 g | -66.2% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.22 g | 2.71 g | +1131.8% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.08 g | 0.25 g | +212.5% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.02 g | 0.03 g | +50.0% |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 29.2 µg | 8.1 µg | -72.3% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.02 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.02 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.24 g | 0.01 g | -95.8% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.95 g | 0.9 g | -53.8% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.9 g | 0.29 g | -67.8% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 517 mg | 402 mg | -22.2% |
| Su | 58.92 g | 74.78 g | +26.9% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.13 g | 1.35 g | -56.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 10 µg | 16 µg | +60.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 109.5 mg | 37.4 mg | -65.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.52 g | 2.17 g | -38.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 8.25 g | 6.98 g | -15.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.34 g | 3.02 g | +788.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.76 g | 3.03 g | +72.2% |
| Çinko | 4.78 mg | 0.74 mg | -84.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Biftek Teriyaki and Kung Pao Tavuk.
Kung Pao Tavuk has less energy per 100 g (129 kcal versus 198 kcal).
For measured PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit), Biftek Teriyaki has 0.22 g and Kung Pao Tavuk has 2.71 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Biftek Teriyaki 54, Kung Pao Tavuk 26.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.