Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Biftek has a higher nutrition quality score (53) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
230 vs 242(+5.2%)
Score Diff
53 vs 35(-34.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biftek
Higher energy
Mock Tavuk Legs
Score leader
Biftek
Nutrient split
25 - 21 (tie: 19)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Biftek and Mock Tavuk Legs are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Biftek has 230.0 kcal and Mock Tavuk Legs has 242.0 kcal. The difference is 12.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 53 and 35. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Biftek | Mock Tavuk Legs | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 4 µg | 2 µg | -50.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.09 mg | 0.35 mg | +288.9% |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.99 µg | 1.24 µg | -37.7% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.26 mg | 0.24 mg | -7.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | 0.48 mg | -26.2% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.09 mg | +12.5% |
| Besin folati | 6 µg | 6 µg | 0.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.2 µg | 0.5 µg | +150.0% |
| Demir | 2.6 mg | 1.11 mg | -57.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.3 g | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.25 mg | 1.93 mg | +672.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 230 kj | 242 kj | +5.2% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 6 µg | 28 µg | +366.7% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 13 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 221 mg | 182 mg | -17.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.5 µg | 9.6 µg | +540.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 17 mg | 17 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 8.04 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 83 mg | 57 mg | -31.3% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 7 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 24 mg | +14.3% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.43 g | 0.15 g | -65.1% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 5.27 g | 5.49 g | +4.2% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.03 g | 0.08 g | +166.7% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 6.55 mg | 6.5 mg | -0.8% |
| Potasyum | 321 mg | 254 mg | -20.9% |
| Protein | 26.95 g | 21.54 g | -20.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.54 g | 3.49 g | +546.3% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.04 g | 0.41 g | +925.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.05 g | 0.04 g | -20.0% |
| Retinol | 4 µg | 2 µg | -50.0% |
| Selenyum | 29.7 µg | 28.2 µg | -5.1% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.35 g | 0.08 g | -77.1% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 2.98 g | 1.84 g | -38.3% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 1.76 g | 0.79 g | -55.1% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 367 mg | 313 mg | -14.7% |
| Su | 58.75 g | 55.25 g | -6.0% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.31 g | 2.81 g | -47.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 6 µg | 19 µg | +216.7% |
| Toplam Kolin | 78.8 mg | 84.4 mg | +7.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.88 g | 5.75 g | -2.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.99 g | 13.59 g | +4.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.67 g | 3.96 g | +491.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 0.13 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.07 mg | 1.45 mg | -71.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Biftek and Mock Tavuk Legs.
Biftek has less energy per 100 g (230 kcal versus 242 kcal).
For measured PUFA 18:3, Biftek has 0.04 g and Mock Tavuk Legs has 0.41 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Biftek 53, Mock Tavuk Legs 35.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.