Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Biberiye (Kurutulmuş) has a higher nutrition quality score (73) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
331 vs 337(+1.8%)
Score Diff
73 vs 66(-9.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biberiye (Kurutulmuş)
Higher energy
Anason Tohumu
Score leader
Biberiye (Kurutulmuş)
Nutrient split
11 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Biberiye (Kurutulmuş) and Anason Tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Biberiye (Kurutulmuş) has 331.0 kcal and Anason Tohumu has 337.0 kcal. The difference is 6.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 73 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Biberiye (Kurutulmuş) | Anason Tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 156 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.51 mg | 0.34 mg | -33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.43 mg | 0.29 mg | -32.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.74 mg | 0.65 mg | -62.6% |
| Bakir | 0.55 mg | 0.91 mg | +65.5% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 61.2 mg | 21 mg | -65.7% |
| Demir | 29.25 mg | 36.96 mg | +26.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 42.6 g | 14.6 g | -65.7% |
| Fosfor | 70 mg | 440 mg | +528.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 1280 mg | 646 mg | -49.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.06 g | 50.02 g | -21.9% |
| Kül | 6.53 g | 7.04 g | +7.8% |
| Magnezyum | 220 mg | 170 mg | -22.7% |
| Mangan | 1.87 mg | 2.3 mg | +23.0% |
| Niasin | 1 mg | 3.06 mg | +206.0% |
| Potasyum | 668 mg | 1441 mg | +115.7% |
| Protein | 4.88 g | 17.6 g | +260.7% |
| Sodyum | 50 mg | 16 mg | -68.0% |
| Su | 9.31 g | 9.54 g | +2.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.84 g | 0.59 g | -79.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 307 µg | 10 µg | -96.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 9.78 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 15.22 g | 15.9 g | +4.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.15 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.23 mg | 5.3 mg | +64.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Biberiye (Kurutulmuş) and Anason Tohumu.
Biberiye (Kurutulmuş) has less energy per 100 g (331 kcal versus 337 kcal).
For measured Fosfor, Biberiye (Kurutulmuş) has 70 mg and Anason Tohumu has 440 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Biberiye (Kurutulmuş) 73, Anason Tohumu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.