Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
118 kcal
Score
0 / 100
Beyaz pancar has a higher nutrition quality score (61) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
43 vs 118(+174.4%)
Score Diff
61 vs 0(-100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Beyaz pancar
Higher energy
Kereviz tuzu
Score leader
Beyaz pancar
Nutrient split
2 - 18 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Beyaz pancar and Kereviz tuzu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Beyaz pancar has 43.0 kcal and Kereviz tuzu has 118.0 kcal. The difference is 75.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 61 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Beyaz pancar | Kereviz tuzu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.031 mg | 0.1 mg | +222.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.11 mg | +175.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.067 mg | 0.07 mg | +4.5% |
| Bakir | 0.075 mg | 0.15 mg | +100.0% |
| Betain | 128.7 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.9 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 13.5 mg | +1587.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 3.6 g | +28.6% |
| Folat DFE | 109 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 40 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 372 mg | +2225.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 9.56 g | 12.3 g | +28.7% |
| Kül | 1.08 g | 71 g | +6474.1% |
| Magnezyum | 23 mg | 132 mg | +473.9% |
| Mangan | 0.326 mg | 0.6 mg | +84.0% |
| Niasin | 0.334 mg | 0.9 mg | +169.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.155 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 325 mg | 420 mg | +29.2% |
| Protein | 1.61 g | 5.4 g | +235.4% |
| Sodyum | 78 mg | 28000 mg | +35797.4% |
| Su | 87.58 g | 3 g | -96.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.027 g | 1.2 g | +4344.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.5 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.17 g | 7.5 g | +4311.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.8 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 6.76 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.35 mg | 2 mg | +471.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Beyaz pancar and Kereviz tuzu.
Beyaz pancar has less energy per 100 g (43 kcal versus 118 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Beyaz pancar has 78 mg and Kereviz tuzu has 28000 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Beyaz pancar 61, Kereviz tuzu 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.