Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
289 kcal
Score
12 / 100
Turta, Çilek has a higher nutrition quality score (12) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 289(+2.5%)
Score Diff
10 vs 12(+20.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Turta, Çilek
Higher energy
Turta, Çilek
Score leader
Turta, Çilek
Nutrient split
25 - 25 (tie: 15)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Basbousa (İrmik Tatlısı) and Turta, Çilek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Basbousa (İrmik Tatlısı) has 282.0 kcal and Turta, Çilek has 289.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 10 and 12. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Basbousa (İrmik Tatlısı) | Turta, Çilek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 12 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.15 mg | 0.13 mg | -13.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.14 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.08 mg | -60.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.03 mg | 0.04 mg | +33.3% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0.07 mg | 0.0% |
| Besin folati | 7 µg | 22 µg | +214.3% |
| Beta Karoten | 1 µg | 8 µg | +700.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.2 mg | 15.8 mg | +7800.0% |
| D Vitamini | 0.1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1.37 mg | +14.2% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.8 g | 2.2 g | +175.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.3 mg | 0.31 mg | -76.2% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 282 kj | 289 kj | +2.5% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 35 µg | 55 µg | +57.1% |
| Folik asit | 17 µg | 20 µg | +17.6% |
| Fosfor | 108 mg | 39 mg | -63.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 3.9 µg | 3.9 µg | 0.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 119 mg | 15 mg | -87.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 43.76 g | 44.22 g | +1.1% |
| Kolesterol | 3 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 3 µg | 9 µg | +200.0% |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 11 mg | -47.6% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.03 g | 0.16 g | +433.3% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 4.14 g | 5.22 g | +26.1% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.06 g | +500.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 1.22 mg | 1.41 mg | +15.6% |
| Potasyum | 148 mg | 89 mg | -39.9% |
| Protein | 4.81 g | 2.88 g | -40.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 2.36 g | 1.37 g | -41.9% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.14 g | 0.08 g | -42.9% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Retinol | 12 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 4.4 µg | 2.9 µg | -34.1% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.02 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.03 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.09 g | 0.11 g | +22.2% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.23 g | 2.15 g | +74.8% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.92 g | 1.38 g | +50.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.02 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 81 mg | 189 mg | +133.3% |
| Su | 40.47 g | 40.55 g | +0.2% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.43 g | 3.72 g | +53.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 24 µg | 41 µg | +70.8% |
| Toplam Kolin | 9 mg | 7.3 mg | -18.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.18 g | 5.44 g | +30.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 9.94 g | 11.6 g | +16.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.46 g | 1.49 g | -39.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 29.79 g | 22.59 g | -24.2% |
| Çinko | 0.58 mg | 0.25 mg | -56.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Basbousa (İrmik Tatlısı) and Turta, Çilek.
Basbousa (İrmik Tatlısı) has less energy per 100 g (282 kcal versus 289 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Basbousa (İrmik Tatlısı) has 0.2 mg and Turta, Çilek has 15.8 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Basbousa (İrmik Tatlısı) 10, Turta, Çilek 12.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.