Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
379 kcal
Score
27 / 100
Glutensiz yulaf has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
250 vs 379(+51.6%)
Score Diff
6 vs 27(+350.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Glutensiz yulaf
Higher energy
Glutensiz yulaf
Score leader
Glutensiz yulaf
Nutrient split
2 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Balzamik glaze and Glutensiz yulaf are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Balzamik glaze has 250.0 kcal and Glutensiz yulaf has 379.0 kcal. The difference is 129.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 27. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Balzamik glaze | Glutensiz yulaf | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.46 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.39 mg | +387.5% |
| Beta-glukan | — | 4 g | — |
| Demir | 0.72 mg | 4.25 mg | +490.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 10.1 g | — |
| Enerji | 1046 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 250 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 22 mg | 410 mg | +1763.6% |
| Fruktoz | 26.5 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 27.2 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 27 mg | 52 mg | +92.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.5 g | 67.7 g | +11.9% |
| Kül | 1.8 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 138 mg | +762.5% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | 3.63 mg | +2320.0% |
| Niasin | — | 1.1 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 210 mg | 362 mg | +72.4% |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 13.15 g | +1543.7% |
| Sodyum | 35 mg | 2 mg | -94.3% |
| Su | 36.8 g | 8.2 g | -77.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.11 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 32 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.18 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 6.52 g | +6420.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.54 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 54.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.12 mg | 3.64 mg | +2933.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Balzamik glaze and Glutensiz yulaf.
Balzamik glaze has less energy per 100 g (250 kcal versus 379 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Balzamik glaze has 0.1 g and Glutensiz yulaf has 6.52 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Balzamik glaze 6, Glutensiz yulaf 27.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.