Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
42 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Ebegümeci yaprağı has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
250 vs 42(-83.2%)
Score Diff
6 vs 100(+1566.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ebegümeci yaprağı
Higher energy
Balzamik glaze
Score leader
Ebegümeci yaprağı
Nutrient split
2 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Balzamik glaze and Ebegümeci yaprağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Balzamik glaze has 250.0 kcal and Ebegümeci yaprağı has 42.0 kcal. The difference is 208.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
12 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Balzamik glaze | Ebegümeci yaprağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 320 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.12 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 3840 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 45 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.72 mg | 7.8 mg | +983.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 4.1 g | — |
| Enerji | 1046 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 250 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 22 mg | 58 mg | +163.6% |
| Fruktoz | 26.5 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 27.2 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 290 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 27 mg | 285 mg | +955.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.5 g | 6.9 g | -88.6% |
| Kül | 1.8 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 75 mg | +368.8% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.8 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 210 mg | 480 mg | +128.6% |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 4.2 g | +425.0% |
| Sodyum | 35 mg | 12 mg | -65.7% |
| Su | 36.8 g | 84.5 g | +129.6% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 82 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.6 g | +500.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 54.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.12 mg | 0.8 mg | +566.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Balzamik glaze and Ebegümeci yaprağı.
Ebegümeci yaprağı has less energy per 100 g (42 kcal versus 250 kcal).
For measured Demir, Balzamik glaze has 0.72 mg and Ebegümeci yaprağı has 7.8 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Balzamik glaze 6, Ebegümeci yaprağı 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.