Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Balsamik Sirke (Modena) has a higher nutrition quality score (12) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
88 vs 263(+198.9%)
Score Diff
12 vs 6(-50.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Balsamik Sirke (Modena)
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Balsamik Sirke (Modena)
Nutrient split
9 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Balsamik Sirke (Modena) and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Balsamik Sirke (Modena) has 88.0 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 175.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 12 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Balsamik Sirke (Modena) | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| Bakir | 0.026 mg | 0.04 mg | +53.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 8 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.72 mg | 0.4 mg | -44.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 1.1 g | — |
| Enerji | 368 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 88 kcal | 263 kcal | +198.9% |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 19 mg | 9 mg | -52.6% |
| Fruktoz | 7.55 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 7.4 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 27 mg | 15 mg | -44.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 17.03 g | 68 g | +299.3% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 0.5 g | 0.3 g | -40.0% |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 6 mg | -50.0% |
| Mangan | 0.131 mg | 0.15 mg | +14.5% |
| Potasyum | 112 mg | 77 mg | -31.3% |
| Protein | 0.49 g | 0.4 g | -18.4% |
| Sodyum | 23 mg | 12 mg | -47.8% |
| Su | 76.45 g | 30.2 g | -60.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0.1 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 14.95 g | 60.3 g | +303.3% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Balsamik Sirke (Modena) and Ahududu reçeli.
Balsamik Sirke (Modena) has less energy per 100 g (88 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Balsamik Sirke (Modena) has 14.95 g and Ahududu reçeli has 60.3 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Balsamik Sirke (Modena) 12, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.