Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
43 kcal
Score
61 / 100
Balkabağı (Çiğ) has a higher nutrition quality score (83) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
26 vs 43(+65.4%)
Score Diff
83 vs 61(-26.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Balkabağı (Çiğ)
Higher energy
Kırmızı Pancar
Score leader
Balkabağı (Çiğ)
Nutrient split
10 - 10 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Balkabağı (Çiğ) and Kırmızı Pancar are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Balkabağı (Çiğ) has 26.0 kcal and Kırmızı Pancar has 43.0 kcal. The difference is 17.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 83 and 61. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Balkabağı (Çiğ) | Kırmızı Pancar | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 426 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.031 mg | -38.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.04 mg | -63.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.061 mg | 0.067 mg | +9.8% |
| Bakir | 0.127 mg | 0.075 mg | -40.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 3100 µg | 20 µg | -99.4% |
| Betain | — | 128.7 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9 mg | 4.9 mg | -45.6% |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 0.8 mg | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 2.8 g | +460.0% |
| Fosfor | 44 mg | 40 mg | -9.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 21 mg | 16 mg | -23.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.5 g | 9.56 g | +47.1% |
| Kül | — | 1.08 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 23 mg | +91.7% |
| Mangan | 0.125 mg | 0.329 mg | +163.2% |
| Niasin | 0.6 mg | 0.334 mg | -44.3% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.155 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 340 mg | 325 mg | -4.4% |
| Protein | 1 g | 1.61 g | +61.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 78 mg | +7700.0% |
| Su | 91.6 g | 87.58 g | -4.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 16 µg | 109 µg | +581.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.17 g | +70.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 6.76 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.32 mg | 0.35 mg | +9.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Balkabağı (Çiğ) and Kırmızı Pancar.
Balkabağı (Çiğ) has less energy per 100 g (26 kcal versus 43 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Balkabağı (Çiğ) has 1 mg and Kırmızı Pancar has 78 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Balkabağı (Çiğ) 83, Kırmızı Pancar 61.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.