Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
717 kcal
Score
1 / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
902 vs 717(-20.5%)
Score Diff
— vs 1
Higher energy
Balık Yağ, Somon
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
8 - 16 (tie: 5)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Balık Yağ, Somon and Salata Sosu, Mayonez, Soya Yağ, Tuzsuz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Balık Yağ, Somon has 902.0 kcal and Salata Sosu, Mayonez, Soya Yağ, Tuzsuz has 717.0 kcal. The difference is 185.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
29 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Balık Yağ, Somon | Salata Sosu - Tuzsuz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | 280 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 84 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0 mg | — | — |
| Besin folati | 0 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Demir | 0 mg | 0.5 mg | — |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 18.23 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 2.99 g | — | — |
| Enerji | 3774 kj | 717 kj | -81.0% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 13.02 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 0 µg | — | — |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 0 mg | 28 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 0 mg | 18 mg | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 2.7 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 485 mg | 59 mg | -87.8% |
| Kül | 0 g | 0.1 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 0 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | 0 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 4.82 g | 0.1 g | -97.9% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 16.98 g | 22.5 g | +32.5% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 3.86 g | 0.1 g | -97.4% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 3.38 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 0 mg | 34 mg | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.1 g | — |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.54 g | 37.1 g | +2309.1% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 1.06 g | 4.2 g | +296.2% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 2.8 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.68 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 84 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 0 µg | 1.6 µg | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 3.28 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 9.84 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 4.25 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 0 mg | 30 mg | — |
| Su | 0 g | 16.7 g | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 19.87 g | 11.8 g | -40.6% |
| Toplam Folat | 0 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 29.04 g | 22.7 g | -21.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 100 g | 79.4 g | -20.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 40.32 g | 37.1 g | -8.0% |
| Çinko | 0 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Balık Yağ, Somon and Salata Sosu, Mayonez, Soya Yağ, Tuzsuz.
Salata Sosu - Tuzsuz has less energy per 100 g (717 kcal versus 902 kcal).
For measured PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit), Balık Yağ, Somon has 1.54 g and Salata Sosu - Tuzsuz has 37.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Balık Yağ, Somon —, Salata Sosu - Tuzsuz 1.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Balık Yağ, Somon · Salata Sosu, Mayonez, Soya Yağ, Tuzsuz · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.