Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
219 kcal
Score
30 / 100
Kung Pao Domuz has a higher nutrition quality score (30) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
195 vs 219(+12.3%)
Score Diff
26 vs 30(+15.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kung Pao Domuz
Higher energy
Kung Pao Domuz
Score leader
Kung Pao Domuz
Nutrient split
18 - 27 (tie: 20)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bademli Tavuk and Kung Pao Domuz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bademli Tavuk has 195.0 kcal and Kung Pao Domuz has 219.0 kcal. The difference is 24.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 30. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bademli Tavuk | Kung Pao Domuz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 19 µg | 16 µg | -15.8% |
| Alfa Karoten | 2 µg | 2 µg | 0.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.54 mg | +980.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.19 µg | 0.38 µg | +100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.21 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.36 mg | +100.0% |
| Bakir | 0.14 mg | 0.08 mg | -42.9% |
| Besin folati | 15 µg | 15 µg | 0.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 160 µg | 159 µg | -0.6% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 41 µg | 41 µg | 0.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 11.8 mg | 12 mg | +1.7% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.4 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.82 mg | 0.84 mg | +2.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 1 g | -16.7% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.15 mg | 1.59 mg | -49.5% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 195 kj | 219 kj | +12.3% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 15 µg | 15 µg | 0.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 166 mg | 165 mg | -0.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 13.7 µg | 13.7 µg | 0.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 36 mg | 22 mg | -38.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.46 g | 4.55 g | +2.0% |
| Kolesterol | 57 mg | 41 mg | -28.1% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | 49 µg | -2.0% |
| Magnezyum | 37 mg | 33 mg | -10.8% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.27 g | 0.18 g | -33.3% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 6.04 g | 6.41 g | +6.1% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.04 g | 0.13 g | +225.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.34 mg | 4.35 mg | +0.2% |
| Potasyum | 243 mg | 313 mg | +28.8% |
| Protein | 15.66 g | 16.89 g | +7.9% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 3.52 g | 3.2 g | -9.1% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.24 g | 0.23 g | -4.2% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.02 g | +100.0% |
| Retinol | 4 µg | 1 µg | -75.0% |
| Selenyum | 12.6 µg | 18.8 µg | +49.2% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.02 g | 0.07 g | +250.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.46 g | 1.98 g | +35.6% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.38 g | 0.86 g | +126.3% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 330 mg | 183 mg | -44.5% |
| Su | 65.46 g | 62.59 g | -4.4% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.92 g | 3.2 g | +66.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 16 µg | 15 µg | -6.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | 39.3 mg | 56.6 mg | +44.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.37 g | 6.75 g | +6.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 13.16 g | 14.76 g | +12.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.78 g | 3.47 g | -8.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.42 g | 1.43 g | +0.7% |
| Çinko | 1.14 mg | 1.58 mg | +38.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bademli Tavuk and Kung Pao Domuz.
Bademli Tavuk has less energy per 100 g (195 kcal versus 219 kcal).
For measured B1 Vitamini (Tiamin), Bademli Tavuk has 0.05 mg and Kung Pao Domuz has 0.54 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bademli Tavuk 26, Kung Pao Domuz 30.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.