Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
295 kcal
Score
14 / 100
Bademli Tavuk has a higher nutrition quality score (26) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
195 vs 295(+51.3%)
Score Diff
26 vs 14(-46.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Bademli Tavuk
Higher energy
General Tso Tavuk
Score leader
Bademli Tavuk
Nutrient split
22 - 32 (tie: 11)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bademli Tavuk and General Tso Tavuk are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bademli Tavuk has 195.0 kcal and General Tso Tavuk has 295.0 kcal. The difference is 100.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 14. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bademli Tavuk | General Tso Tavuk | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 19 µg | 11 µg | -42.1% |
| Alfa Karoten | 2 µg | 2 µg | 0.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.03 mg | -40.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.19 µg | 0.22 µg | +15.8% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.12 mg | -42.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.2 mg | +11.1% |
| Bakir | 0.14 mg | 0.05 mg | -64.3% |
| Besin folati | 15 µg | 6 µg | -60.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 160 µg | 37 µg | -76.9% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 41 µg | 9 µg | -78.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 11.8 mg | 1.6 mg | -86.4% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.2 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.82 mg | 1.16 mg | +41.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 0.9 g | -25.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.15 mg | 1.21 mg | -61.6% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 195 kj | 295 kj | +51.3% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 15 µg | 15 µg | 0.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 166 mg | 127 mg | -23.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 13.7 µg | 38.2 µg | +178.8% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 36 mg | 12 mg | -66.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.46 g | 23.99 g | +437.9% |
| Kolesterol | 57 mg | 53 mg | -7.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 20 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 50 µg | 99 µg | +98.0% |
| Magnezyum | 37 mg | 18 mg | -51.4% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.27 g | 0.19 g | -29.6% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 6.04 g | 3.59 g | -40.6% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.04 g | 0.07 g | +75.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.34 mg | 2.85 mg | -34.3% |
| Potasyum | 243 mg | 201 mg | -17.3% |
| Protein | 15.66 g | 12.9 g | -17.6% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 3.52 g | 6.54 g | +85.8% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.24 g | 0.84 g | +250.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.06 g | +500.0% |
| Retinol | 4 µg | 7 µg | +75.0% |
| Selenyum | 12.6 µg | 14.4 µg | +14.3% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.02 g | 0.03 g | +50.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.46 g | 1.92 g | +31.5% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.38 g | 0.68 g | +78.9% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Sodyum | 330 mg | 435 mg | +31.8% |
| Su | 65.46 g | 45.15 g | -31.0% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.92 g | 2.76 g | +43.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 16 µg | 11 µg | -31.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | 39.3 mg | 41.5 mg | +5.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.37 g | 3.88 g | -39.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 13.16 g | 16.36 g | +24.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.78 g | 7.5 g | +98.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.42 g | 11.6 g | +716.9% |
| Çinko | 1.14 mg | 1.3 mg | +14.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bademli Tavuk and General Tso Tavuk.
Bademli Tavuk has less energy per 100 g (195 kcal versus 295 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Bademli Tavuk has 1.42 g and General Tso Tavuk has 11.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bademli Tavuk 26, General Tso Tavuk 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.