Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
1 kcal
Score
91 / 100
Hibiskus çayı has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
268 vs 1(-99.6%)
Score Diff
7 vs 91(+1200.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hibiskus çayı
Higher energy
Ayva ezmesi
Score leader
Hibiskus çayı
Nutrient split
15 - 1 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ayva ezmesi and Hibiskus çayı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ayva ezmesi has 268.0 kcal and Hibiskus çayı has 1.0 kcal. The difference is 267.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 7 and 91. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ayva ezmesi | Hibiskus çayı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.02 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.09 mg | 0.002 mg | -97.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9.5 mg | 1.2 mg | -87.4% |
| Demir | 0.6 mg | 0.08 mg | -86.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 268 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 1 mg | -91.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 14 mg | 8 mg | -42.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68.9 g | 0.08 g | -99.9% |
| Kül | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 3 mg | -57.1% |
| Mangan | — | 0.012 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.2 mg | 0.04 mg | -80.0% |
| Potasyum | 145 mg | 9 mg | -93.8% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 6 mg | 4 mg | -33.3% |
| Su | 29.8 g | 99.58 g | +234.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.02 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 1 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 62.5 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Çinko | 0.08 mg | 0.01 mg | -87.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ayva ezmesi and Hibiskus çayı.
Hibiskus çayı has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 268 kcal).
For measured Su, Ayva ezmesi has 29.8 g and Hibiskus çayı has 99.58 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ayva ezmesi 7, Hibiskus çayı 91.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.