Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
23 kcal
Score
91 / 100
Yonca filizi has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
14 vs 23(+64.3%)
Score Diff
81 vs 91(+12.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yonca filizi
Higher energy
Yonca filizi
Score leader
Yonca filizi
Nutrient split
8 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aysberg marul and Yonca filizi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aysberg marul has 14.0 kcal and Yonca filizi has 23.0 kcal. The difference is 9.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 81 and 91. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aysberg marul | Yonca filizi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 25 µg | 8 µg | -68.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.041 mg | 0.076 mg | +85.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.025 mg | 0.126 mg | +404.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.042 mg | 0.034 mg | -19.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.157 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 299 µg | 93 µg | -68.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 8.2 mg | +192.9% |
| Demir | 0.41 mg | 0.96 mg | +134.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 1.9 g | +58.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 23 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 29 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 20 mg | 70 mg | +250.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.1 µg | 30.5 µg | +26.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 32 mg | +77.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.97 g | 2.1 g | -29.3% |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 27 mg | +285.7% |
| Mangan | — | 0.188 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.123 mg | 0.481 mg | +291.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.563 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 141 mg | 79 mg | -44.0% |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 3.99 g | +343.3% |
| Selenyum | — | 0.6 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 10 mg | 6 mg | -40.0% |
| Su | 95.64 g | 93.42 g | -2.3% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 36 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.14 g | 0.69 g | +392.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.97 g | 0.18 g | -90.9% |
| Çinko | 0.15 mg | 0.92 mg | +513.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aysberg marul and Yonca filizi.
Aysberg marul has less energy per 100 g (14 kcal versus 23 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Aysberg marul has 0.15 mg and Yonca filizi has 0.92 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aysberg marul 81, Yonca filizi 91.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.