Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
16 kcal
Score
93 / 100
Kırmızı kıvırcık marul has a higher nutrition quality score (93) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
14 vs 16(+14.3%)
Score Diff
81 vs 93(+14.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kırmızı kıvırcık marul
Higher energy
Kırmızı kıvırcık marul
Score leader
Kırmızı kıvırcık marul
Nutrient split
4 - 17 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aysberg marul and Kırmızı kıvırcık marul are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aysberg marul has 14.0 kcal and Kırmızı kıvırcık marul has 16.0 kcal. The difference is 2.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 81 and 93. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aysberg marul | Kırmızı kıvırcık marul | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 7492 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 25 µg | 375 µg | +1400.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.041 mg | 0.064 mg | +56.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.025 mg | 0.077 mg | +208.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.042 mg | 0.1 mg | +138.1% |
| Beta Karoten | 299 µg | 4495 µg | +1403.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.8 mg | 3.7 mg | +32.1% |
| Demir | 0.41 mg | 1.2 mg | +192.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 0.9 g | -25.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 29 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 20 mg | 28 mg | +40.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.1 µg | 140.3 µg | +482.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 33 mg | +83.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.97 g | 2.26 g | -23.9% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 1724 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 12 mg | +71.4% |
| Mangan | — | 0.375 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.123 mg | 0.321 mg | +161.0% |
| Potasyum | 141 mg | 187 mg | +32.6% |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1.33 g | +47.8% |
| Sodyum | 10 mg | 25 mg | +150.0% |
| Su | 95.64 g | 95.63 g | -0.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 36 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.14 g | 0.22 g | +57.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.97 g | 0.49 g | -75.1% |
| Çinko | 0.15 mg | 0.2 mg | +33.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aysberg marul and Kırmızı kıvırcık marul.
Aysberg marul has less energy per 100 g (14 kcal versus 16 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Aysberg marul has 299 µg and Kırmızı kıvırcık marul has 4495 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aysberg marul 81, Kırmızı kıvırcık marul 93.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.