Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
77 kcal
Score
58 / 100
Kerevit has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
82 vs 77(-6.1%)
Score Diff
56 vs 58(+3.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kerevit
Higher energy
Atlantik morinası
Score leader
Kerevit
Nutrient split
6 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Atlantik morinası and Kerevit are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Atlantik morinası has 82.0 kcal and Kerevit has 77.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 56 and 58. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Atlantik morinası | Kerevit | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 12 µg | 15 µg | +25.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.076 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.91 µg | 2.15 µg | +136.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.065 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.245 mg | 0.12 mg | -51.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.4 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.9 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.38 mg | 0.84 mg | +121.1% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.25 mg | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.064 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 203 mg | 238 mg | +17.2% |
| İyot | 110 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 27 mg | +68.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 43 mg | 107 mg | +148.8% |
| Kül | 1.16 g | 1.78 g | +53.4% |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 27 mg | -15.6% |
| Mangan | — | 0.17 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.063 mg | 1.87 mg | -9.4% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.47 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 413 mg | 256 mg | -38.0% |
| Protein | 17.81 g | 15.97 g | -10.3% |
| Selenyum | 33.1 µg | 31.2 µg | -5.7% |
| Sodyum | 54 mg | 58 mg | +7.4% |
| Su | 81.22 g | 81.3 g | +0.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.131 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.094 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.67 g | 0.95 g | +41.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.212 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.45 mg | 1.3 mg | +188.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Atlantik morinası and Kerevit.
Kerevit has less energy per 100 g (77 kcal versus 82 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Atlantik morinası has 0.45 mg and Kerevit has 1.3 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Atlantik morinası 56, Kerevit 58.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.