Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
104 kcal
Score
64 / 100
Karakulak balığı has a higher nutrition quality score (64) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
82 vs 104(+26.8%)
Score Diff
56 vs 64(+14.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Karakulak balığı
Higher energy
Karakulak balığı
Score leader
Karakulak balığı
Nutrient split
4 - 19 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Atlantik morinası and Karakulak balığı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Atlantik morinası has 82.0 kcal and Karakulak balığı has 104.0 kcal. The difference is 22.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 56 and 64. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
25 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Atlantik morinası | Karakulak balığı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 12 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.076 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.91 µg | 2.35 µg | +158.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.065 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.245 mg | 0.38 mg | +55.1% |
| D Vitamini | 0.9 µg | 2.4 µg | +166.7% |
| Demir | 0.38 mg | 0.68 mg | +78.9% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.12 g | 0.38 g | +216.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.064 g | 0.18 g | +181.2% |
| Fosfor | 203 mg | 215 mg | +5.9% |
| İyot | 110 µg | 24 µg | -78.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 28 mg | +75.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 43 mg | 58 mg | +34.9% |
| Kül | 1.16 g | 1.2 g | +3.4% |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 31 mg | -3.1% |
| Niasin | 2.063 mg | 4.8 mg | +132.7% |
| Potasyum | 413 mg | 365 mg | -11.6% |
| Protein | 17.81 g | 19.8 g | +11.2% |
| Selenyum | 33.1 µg | 38.5 µg | +16.3% |
| Sodyum | 54 mg | 62 mg | +14.8% |
| Su | 81.22 g | 77.8 g | -4.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.131 g | 0.58 g | +342.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.094 g | 0.65 g | +591.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.67 g | 2.3 g | +243.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.212 g | 0.72 g | +239.6% |
| Çinko | 0.45 mg | 0.85 mg | +88.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Atlantik morinası and Karakulak balığı.
Atlantik morinası has less energy per 100 g (82 kcal versus 104 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Atlantik morinası has 0.094 g and Karakulak balığı has 0.65 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Atlantik morinası 56, Karakulak balığı 64.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.