Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
23 kcal
Score
91 / 100
Yonca filizi has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
72 vs 23(-68.1%)
Score Diff
45 vs 91(+102.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yonca filizi
Higher energy
Arpacık Soğan
Score leader
Yonca filizi
Nutrient split
10 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arpacık Soğan and Yonca filizi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arpacık Soğan has 72.0 kcal and Yonca filizi has 23.0 kcal. The difference is 49.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 45 and 91. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arpacık Soğan | Yonca filizi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 66 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 8 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.076 mg | +26.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.126 mg | +530.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.345 mg | 0.034 mg | -90.1% |
| Bakir | 0.088 mg | 0.157 mg | +78.4% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 93 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 8.2 mg | +2.5% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 0.96 mg | -20.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 1.9 g | -40.6% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 23 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 60 mg | 70 mg | +16.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 30.5 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 37 mg | 32 mg | -13.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 16.8 g | 2.1 g | -87.5% |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 27 mg | +28.6% |
| Mangan | 0.292 mg | 0.188 mg | -35.6% |
| Niasin | 0.2 mg | 0.481 mg | +140.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.563 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 334 mg | 79 mg | -76.3% |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 3.99 g | +59.6% |
| Selenyum | 1.2 µg | 0.6 µg | -50.0% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 6 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 79.8 g | 93.42 g | +17.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 34 µg | 36 µg | +5.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.69 g | +590.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.87 g | 0.18 g | -97.7% |
| Çinko | 0.4 mg | 0.92 mg | +130.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arpacık Soğan and Yonca filizi.
Yonca filizi has less energy per 100 g (23 kcal versus 72 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Arpacık Soğan has 0.1 g and Yonca filizi has 0.69 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arpacık Soğan 45, Yonca filizi 91.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.