Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
32 kcal
Score
91 / 100
Tere has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
72 vs 32(-55.6%)
Score Diff
45 vs 91(+102.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tere
Higher energy
Arpacık Soğan
Score leader
Tere
Nutrient split
5 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arpacık Soğan and Tere are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arpacık Soğan has 72.0 kcal and Tere has 32.0 kcal. The difference is 40.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 45 and 91. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arpacık Soğan | Tere | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 66 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 346 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.08 mg | +33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.26 mg | +1200.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.345 mg | 0.25 mg | -27.5% |
| Bakir | 0.088 mg | 0.17 mg | +93.2% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 4150 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 69 mg | +762.5% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1.3 mg | +8.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 1.1 g | -65.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.7 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 60 mg | 76 mg | +26.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 541.9 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 37 mg | 81 mg | +118.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 16.8 g | 5.5 g | -67.3% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 12500 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 38 mg | +81.0% |
| Mangan | 0.292 mg | 0.55 mg | +88.4% |
| Niasin | 0.2 mg | 1 mg | +400.0% |
| Potasyum | 334 mg | 606 mg | +81.4% |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 2.6 g | +4.0% |
| Selenyum | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 14 mg | +16.7% |
| Su | 79.8 g | 89.4 g | +12.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 34 µg | 80 µg | +135.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.7 g | +600.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.87 g | 4.4 g | -44.1% |
| Çinko | 0.4 mg | 0.23 mg | -42.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arpacık Soğan and Tere.
Tere has less energy per 100 g (32 kcal versus 72 kcal).
For measured B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin), Arpacık Soğan has 0.02 mg and Tere has 0.26 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arpacık Soğan 45, Tere 91.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.