Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
152 kcal
Score
44 / 100
Arpacık Soğan has a higher nutrition quality score (45) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
72 vs 152(+111.1%)
Score Diff
45 vs 44(-2.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arpacık Soğan
Higher energy
Sarımsak (Taşköprü)
Score leader
Arpacık Soğan
Nutrient split
3 - 18 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arpacık Soğan and Sarımsak (Taşköprü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arpacık Soğan has 72.0 kcal and Sarımsak (Taşköprü) has 152.0 kcal. The difference is 80.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 45 and 44. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arpacık Soğan | Sarımsak (Taşköprü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 66 iu | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.2 mg | +233.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.11 mg | +450.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.345 mg | 1.23 mg | +256.5% |
| Bakir | 0.088 mg | 0.3 mg | +240.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 31.2 mg | +290.0% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1.7 mg | +41.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 2.1 g | -34.4% |
| Folat DFE | — | 3 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 60 mg | 153 mg | +155.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 37 mg | 181 mg | +389.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 16.8 g | 31.8 g | +89.3% |
| Kül | — | 1.5 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 25 mg | +19.0% |
| Mangan | 0.292 mg | 1.67 mg | +471.9% |
| Niasin | 0.2 mg | 0.7 mg | +250.0% |
| Potasyum | 334 mg | 401 mg | +20.1% |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 6.36 g | +154.4% |
| Selenyum | 1.2 µg | 18.5 µg | +1441.7% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 17 mg | +41.7% |
| Su | 79.8 g | 58.5 g | -26.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.09 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 34 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.5 g | +400.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.25 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.87 g | 1 g | -87.3% |
| Çinko | 0.4 mg | 1.16 mg | +190.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arpacık Soğan and Sarımsak (Taşköprü).
Arpacık Soğan has less energy per 100 g (72 kcal versus 152 kcal).
For measured Selenyum, Arpacık Soğan has 1.2 µg and Sarımsak (Taşköprü) has 18.5 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arpacık Soğan 45, Sarımsak (Taşköprü) 44.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.