Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
223 kcal
Score
50 / 100
Arnavut ciğeri has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
218 vs 223(+2.3%)
Score Diff
71 vs 50(-29.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arnavut ciğeri
Higher energy
Şiş kebap
Score leader
Arnavut ciğeri
Nutrient split
12 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arnavut ciğeri and Şiş kebap are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arnavut ciğeri has 218.0 kcal and Şiş kebap has 223.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 50. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arnavut ciğeri | Şiş kebap | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 5450 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 58.5 µg | 2.4 µg | -95.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 2.55 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.82 mg | 0.35 mg | -57.3% |
| Bakir | 4.2 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 11.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 7.4 mg | 2.1 mg | -71.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 223 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 375 mg | 210 mg | -44.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 15 mg | -6.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.8 g | 1.2 g | -79.3% |
| Kolesterol | 315 mg | 78 mg | -75.2% |
| Kül | — | 1.5 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 22 mg | +4.8% |
| Niasin | 13.2 mg | 6.5 mg | -50.8% |
| Potasyum | 325 mg | 310 mg | -4.6% |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 24.8 g | +21.6% |
| Selenyum | 45.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 460 mg | 340 mg | -26.1% |
| Su | 59.8 g | 57.5 g | -3.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.1 g | 5.1 g | +64.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 275 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.6 g | 5.4 g | +17.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.2 g | 13.2 g | +8.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.5 g | 0.7 g | -80.0% |
| Çinko | 4.1 mg | 4.5 mg | +9.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arnavut ciğeri and Şiş kebap.
Arnavut ciğeri has less energy per 100 g (218 kcal versus 223 kcal).
For measured B12 Vitamini, Arnavut ciğeri has 58.5 µg and Şiş kebap has 2.4 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arnavut ciğeri 71, Şiş kebap 50.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.