Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
268.8 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Arnavut ciğeri has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
218 vs 268.8(+23.3%)
Score Diff
71 vs 42(-40.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arnavut ciğeri
Higher energy
Adana kebabı
Score leader
Arnavut ciğeri
Nutrient split
16 - 3 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arnavut ciğeri and Adana kebabı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arnavut ciğeri has 218.0 kcal and Adana kebabı has 268.8 kcal. The difference is 50.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arnavut ciğeri | Adana kebabı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 5450 µg | 28 µg | -99.5% |
| B12 Vitamini | 58.5 µg | 2.1 µg | -96.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 2.55 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.82 mg | 0.32 mg | -61.0% |
| Bakir | 4.2 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 11.5 mg | 4.2 mg | -63.5% |
| Demir | 7.4 mg | 1.9 mg | -74.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 0.4 g | -20.0% |
| Fosfor | 375 mg | 165 mg | -56.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 16 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.8 g | 1.2 g | -79.3% |
| Kolesterol | 315 mg | 75 mg | -76.2% |
| Kül | — | 1.9 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 18 mg | -14.3% |
| Niasin | 13.2 mg | 4.8 mg | -63.6% |
| Potasyum | 325 mg | 265 mg | -18.5% |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 16.5 g | -19.1% |
| Selenyum | 45.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 460 mg | 460 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 59.8 g | 55.4 g | -7.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.1 g | 10.2 g | +229.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 275 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.6 g | 9.1 g | +97.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.2 g | 22 g | +80.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.5 g | 1.1 g | -68.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.6 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.1 mg | 3.6 mg | -12.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arnavut ciğeri and Adana kebabı.
Arnavut ciğeri has less energy per 100 g (218 kcal versus 268.8 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Arnavut ciğeri has 3.1 g and Adana kebabı has 10.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arnavut ciğeri 71, Adana kebabı 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.