Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
294 kcal
Score
20 / 100
Arnavut ciğeri has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
218 vs 294(+34.9%)
Score Diff
71 vs 20(-71.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arnavut ciğeri
Higher energy
Acuka (Muhammara)
Score leader
Arnavut ciğeri
Nutrient split
6 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arnavut ciğeri and Acuka (Muhammara) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arnavut ciğeri has 218.0 kcal and Acuka (Muhammara) has 294.0 kcal. The difference is 76.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arnavut ciğeri | Acuka (Muhammara) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 5450 µg | 120 µg | -97.8% |
| B12 Vitamini | 58.5 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 2.55 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.82 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 4.2 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1100 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 11.5 mg | 15 mg | +30.4% |
| Demir | 7.4 mg | 1.8 mg | -75.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 3.5 g | +600.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.2 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 35 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 375 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 45 mg | +181.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.8 g | 15 g | +158.6% |
| Kolesterol | 315 mg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 60 mg | +185.7% |
| Niasin | 13.2 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 325 mg | 450 mg | +38.5% |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 4.5 g | -77.9% |
| Selenyum | 45.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 460 mg | 850 mg | +84.8% |
| Su | 59.8 g | 48 g | -19.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.1 g | 2.8 g | -9.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 275 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.6 g | 12.5 g | +171.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.2 g | 24 g | +96.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.5 g | 7.5 g | +114.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 4.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.1 mg | 0.9 mg | -78.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arnavut ciğeri and Acuka (Muhammara).
Arnavut ciğeri has less energy per 100 g (218 kcal versus 294 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Arnavut ciğeri has 0.5 g and Acuka (Muhammara) has 3.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arnavut ciğeri 71, Acuka (Muhammara) 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.