Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
341 kcal
Score
31 / 100
Yeşil bezelye kurusu has a higher nutrition quality score (31) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
357 vs 341(-4.5%)
Score Diff
1 vs 31(+3000.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yeşil bezelye kurusu
Higher energy
Ararot nişastası
Score leader
Yeşil bezelye kurusu
Nutrient split
4 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ararot nişastası and Yeşil bezelye kurusu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ararot nişastası has 357.0 kcal and Yeşil bezelye kurusu has 341.0 kcal. The difference is 16.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 1 and 31. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ararot nişastası | Yeşil bezelye kurusu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.013 mg | 0.73 mg | +5515.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.005 mg | 0.15 mg | +2900.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.27 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.121 mg | 0.49 mg | +305.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 1.8 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.33 mg | 4.43 mg | +1242.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.4 g | 25.5 g | +650.0% |
| Folat DFE | — | 274 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 5 mg | 366 mg | +7220.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 40 mg | 37 mg | -7.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 88.15 g | 60.37 g | -31.5% |
| Kül | 0.14 g | 2.62 g | +1771.4% |
| Magnezyum | 3 mg | 115 mg | +3733.3% |
| Mangan | 0.116 mg | 1.39 mg | +1098.3% |
| Niasin | 0.082 mg | 2.89 mg | +3424.4% |
| Nisasta | 84.75 g | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 1.74 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 11 mg | 981 mg | +8818.2% |
| Protein | 0.32 g | 24.55 g | +7571.9% |
| Selenyum | 0.7 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 21 mg | 15 mg | -28.6% |
| Su | 11.32 g | 11.3 g | -0.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.015 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 7 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.07 g | 1.16 g | +1557.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.06 mg | 3.01 mg | +4916.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ararot nişastası and Yeşil bezelye kurusu.
Yeşil bezelye kurusu has less energy per 100 g (341 kcal versus 357 kcal).
For measured Potasyum, Ararot nişastası has 11 mg and Yeşil bezelye kurusu has 981 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ararot nişastası 1, Yeşil bezelye kurusu 31.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.