Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
215 kcal
Score
49 / 100
Arap saçı balığı has a higher nutrition quality score (68) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
91.2 vs 215(+135.8%)
Score Diff
68 vs 49(-27.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arap saçı balığı
Higher energy
Kuzu pöç
Score leader
Arap saçı balığı
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arap saçı balığı and Kuzu pöç are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arap saçı balığı has 91.2 kcal and Kuzu pöç has 215.0 kcal. The difference is 123.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 68 and 49. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arap saçı balığı | Kuzu pöç | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B12 Vitamini | 2.1 µg | 2.5 µg | +19.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.32 mg | 0.3 mg | -6.3% |
| Bakir | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 2.4 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.7 mg | 2.1 mg | +200.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.28 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 215 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.16 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 230 mg | +9.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 15 mg | -46.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 58 mg | 75 mg | +29.3% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 25 mg | -21.9% |
| Niasin | 2.8 mg | 7 mg | +150.0% |
| Potasyum | 360 mg | 280 mg | -22.2% |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 28.5 g | +48.4% |
| Selenyum | 34.2 µg | 25 µg | -26.9% |
| Sodyum | 72 mg | 70 mg | -2.8% |
| Su | 78.1 g | 57 g | -27.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.38 g | 5.5 g | +1347.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.42 g | 4.8 g | +1042.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.6 g | 12.5 g | +681.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.54 g | 1.2 g | +122.2% |
| Çinko | 0.65 mg | 4 mg | +515.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arap saçı balığı and Kuzu pöç.
Arap saçı balığı has less energy per 100 g (91.2 kcal versus 215 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Arap saçı balığı has 0.38 g and Kuzu pöç has 5.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arap saçı balığı 68, Kuzu pöç 49.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.