Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
165 kcal
Score
55 / 100
Arap saçı balığı has a higher nutrition quality score (68) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
91.2 vs 165(+80.9%)
Score Diff
68 vs 55(-19.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arap saçı balığı
Higher energy
Kuzu İncik
Score leader
Arap saçı balığı
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arap saçı balığı and Kuzu İncik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arap saçı balığı has 91.2 kcal and Kuzu İncik has 165.0 kcal. The difference is 73.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 68 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arap saçı balığı | Kuzu İncik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.11 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.1 µg | 2.45 µg | +16.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.24 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.32 mg | 0.42 mg | +31.2% |
| D Vitamini | 2.4 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.7 mg | 1.95 mg | +178.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.28 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.16 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 192 mg | -8.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 14 mg | -50.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 58 mg | 71 mg | +22.4% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 22 mg | -31.3% |
| Niasin | 2.8 mg | 6.1 mg | +117.9% |
| Potasyum | 360 mg | 315 mg | -12.5% |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 20.2 g | +5.2% |
| Selenyum | 34.2 µg | 26.4 µg | -22.8% |
| Sodyum | 72 mg | 68 mg | -5.6% |
| Su | 78.1 g | 69.5 g | -11.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.38 g | 3.8 g | +900.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 83.5 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.42 g | 3.7 g | +781.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.6 g | 9.2 g | +475.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.54 g | 0.72 g | +33.3% |
| Çinko | 0.65 mg | 4.52 mg | +595.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arap saçı balığı and Kuzu İncik.
Arap saçı balığı has less energy per 100 g (91.2 kcal versus 165 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Arap saçı balığı has 0.38 g and Kuzu İncik has 3.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arap saçı balığı 68, Kuzu İncik 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.