Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
287 kcal
Score
70 / 100
Kurutulmuş Çiroz has a higher nutrition quality score (70) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
91.2 vs 287(+214.7%)
Score Diff
68 vs 70(+2.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kurutulmuş Çiroz
Higher energy
Kurutulmuş Çiroz
Score leader
Kurutulmuş Çiroz
Nutrient split
1 - 21 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arap saçı balığı and Kurutulmuş Çiroz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arap saçı balığı has 91.2 kcal and Kurutulmuş Çiroz has 287.0 kcal. The difference is 195.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 68 and 70. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
24 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arap saçı balığı | Kurutulmuş Çiroz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B12 Vitamini | 2.1 µg | 14.2 µg | +576.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.32 mg | 0.95 mg | +196.9% |
| D Vitamini | 2.4 µg | 12.8 µg | +433.3% |
| Demir | 0.7 mg | 3.1 mg | +342.9% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.28 g | 1.15 g | +310.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.16 g | 0.72 g | +350.0% |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 510 mg | +142.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 85 mg | +203.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 58 mg | 160 mg | +175.9% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 6 g | +400.0% |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 65 mg | +103.1% |
| Niasin | 2.8 mg | 16.5 mg | +489.3% |
| Potasyum | 360 mg | 720 mg | +100.0% |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 54.2 g | +182.3% |
| Selenyum | 34.2 µg | 88.5 µg | +158.8% |
| Sodyum | 72 mg | 2350 mg | +3163.9% |
| Su | 78.1 g | 32 g | -59.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.38 g | 2.1 g | +452.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.42 g | 2.6 g | +519.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.6 g | 7.8 g | +387.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.54 g | 2.2 g | +307.4% |
| Çinko | 0.65 mg | 1.8 mg | +176.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arap saçı balığı and Kurutulmuş Çiroz.
Arap saçı balığı has less energy per 100 g (91.2 kcal versus 287 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Arap saçı balığı has 72 mg and Kurutulmuş Çiroz has 2350 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arap saçı balığı 68, Kurutulmuş Çiroz 70.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.