Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
44 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 44(-45.7%)
Score Diff
62 vs 100(+61.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
8 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Araka and Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Araka has 81.0 kcal and Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 44.0 kcal. The difference is 37.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Araka | Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 4054 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 203 µg | +434.2% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.266 mg | 0.078 mg | -70.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.132 mg | 0.175 mg | +32.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.169 mg | 0.158 mg | -6.5% |
| Bakir | — | 0.24 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1620 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 40 mg | 13.3 mg | -66.8% |
| Demir | 1.47 mg | 11.87 mg | +707.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.7 g | 6.8 g | +19.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.13 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 108 mg | 60 mg | -44.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.8 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 199 mg | +696.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.45 g | 8.41 g | -41.8% |
| Kül | — | 2.02 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 33 mg | 63 mg | +90.9% |
| Mangan | — | 1.12 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.09 mg | 0.948 mg | -54.6% |
| Potasyum | 244 mg | 458 mg | +87.7% |
| Protein | 5.42 g | 3.29 g | -39.3% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 31 mg | +520.0% |
| Su | 78.86 g | 85.55 g | +8.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | 105 µg | +61.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.73 g | +82.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.67 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.24 mg | 1.09 mg | -12.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Araka and Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü).
Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (44 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured Demir, Araka has 1.47 mg and Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 11.87 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Araka 62, Taze Nane (Organik/Köy Usulü) 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.