Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
16 kcal
Score
92 / 100
Sarı kabak has a higher nutrition quality score (92) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 16(-80.3%)
Score Diff
62 vs 92(+48.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sarı kabak
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Sarı kabak
Nutrient split
17 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Araka and Sarı kabak are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Araka has 81.0 kcal and Sarı kabak has 16.0 kcal. The difference is 65.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 92. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Araka | Sarı kabak | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 10 µg | -73.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.266 mg | 0.045 mg | -83.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.132 mg | 0.042 mg | -68.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.169 mg | 0.163 mg | -3.6% |
| Bakir | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 120 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 40 mg | 17 mg | -57.5% |
| Demir | 1.47 mg | 0.37 mg | -74.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.7 g | 1.1 g | -80.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.13 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 16 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 24 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 108 mg | 38 mg | -64.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.8 µg | 4.3 µg | -82.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 15 mg | -40.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.45 g | 3.35 g | -76.8% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 2125 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 33 mg | 18 mg | -45.5% |
| Mangan | — | 0.174 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.09 mg | 0.487 mg | -76.7% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.161 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 244 mg | 261 mg | +7.0% |
| Protein | 5.42 g | 1.21 g | -77.7% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 8 mg | +60.0% |
| Su | 78.86 g | 94.64 g | +20.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.18 g | -55.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.67 g | 2.2 g | -61.2% |
| Çinko | 1.24 mg | 0.29 mg | -76.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Araka and Sarı kabak.
Sarı kabak has less energy per 100 g (16 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured B1 Vitamini (Tiamin), Araka has 0.266 mg and Sarı kabak has 0.045 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Araka 62, Sarı kabak 92.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.