Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
47 kcal
Score
65 / 100
Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (65) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 47(-42.0%)
Score Diff
62 vs 65(+4.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi
Nutrient split
14 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Araka and Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Araka has 81.0 kcal and Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi has 47.0 kcal. The difference is 34.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 65. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Araka | Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 865 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 43 µg | +13.2% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.266 mg | 0.11 mg | -58.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.132 mg | 0.11 mg | -16.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.169 mg | 0.024 mg | -85.8% |
| Bakir | — | 0.11 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 40 mg | 18.8 mg | -53.0% |
| Demir | 1.47 mg | 0.47 mg | -68.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.7 g | 2.5 g | -56.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.13 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 108 mg | 59 mg | -45.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.8 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 50 mg | +100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.45 g | 8.35 g | -42.2% |
| Kül | — | 0.65 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 33 mg | 44 mg | +33.3% |
| Mangan | — | 0.21 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.09 mg | 1.18 mg | -43.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 244 mg | 240 mg | -1.6% |
| Protein | 5.42 g | 2.8 g | -48.3% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 4 mg | -20.0% |
| Su | 78.86 g | 89.1 g | +13.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | 62 µg | -4.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.4 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.67 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.24 mg | 0.37 mg | -70.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Araka and Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi.
Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (47 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Araka has 25 mg and Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi has 50 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Araka 62, Kuşkonmaz Fasulyesi 65.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.