Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
16 kcal
Score
70 / 100
Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (70) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 16(-80.3%)
Score Diff
62 vs 70(+12.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
13 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Araka and Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Araka has 81.0 kcal and Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 16.0 kcal. The difference is 65.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 70. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Araka | Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 22 µg | -42.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.266 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.132 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.169 mg | 0.074 mg | -56.2% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 270 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 40 mg | 3.1 mg | -92.3% |
| Demir | 1.47 mg | 0.2 mg | -86.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.7 g | 1.6 g | -71.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.13 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 36 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 108 mg | 24 mg | -77.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.8 µg | 29.3 µg | +18.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 40 mg | +60.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.45 g | 2.97 g | -79.4% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 232 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 33 mg | 11 mg | -66.7% |
| Mangan | — | 0.103 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.09 mg | 0.32 mg | -84.7% |
| Potasyum | 244 mg | 260 mg | +6.6% |
| Protein | 5.42 g | 0.69 g | -87.3% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 80 mg | +1500.0% |
| Su | 78.86 g | 95.43 g | +21.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.17 g | -57.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.67 g | 1.34 g | -76.4% |
| Çinko | 1.24 mg | 0.13 mg | -89.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Araka and Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü).
Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (16 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Araka has 5 mg and Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 80 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Araka 62, Kereviz Sapı (Organik/Köy Usulü) 70.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.