Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
19 kcal
Score
94 / 100
Kabak filizi has a higher nutrition quality score (94) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 19(-76.5%)
Score Diff
62 vs 94(+51.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kabak filizi
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Kabak filizi
Nutrient split
8 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Araka and Kabak filizi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Araka has 81.0 kcal and Kabak filizi has 19.0 kcal. The difference is 62.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 94. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Araka | Kabak filizi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 97 µg | +155.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.266 mg | 0.08 mg | -69.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.132 mg | 0.14 mg | +6.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.169 mg | 0.2 mg | +18.3% |
| Bakir | — | 0.13 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1164 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 40 mg | 11 mg | -72.5% |
| Demir | 1.47 mg | 2.24 mg | +52.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.7 g | 1.8 g | -68.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.13 mg | 1.44 mg | +1007.7% |
| Folat DFE | — | 36 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 108 mg | 104 mg | -3.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.8 µg | 108.6 µg | +337.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 39 mg | +56.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.45 g | 2.33 g | -83.9% |
| Kül | — | 1.22 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 33 mg | 38 mg | +15.2% |
| Mangan | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.09 mg | 0.9 mg | -56.9% |
| Potasyum | 244 mg | 436 mg | +78.7% |
| Protein | 5.42 g | 3.15 g | -41.9% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 11 mg | +120.0% |
| Su | 78.86 g | 92.9 g | +17.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.08 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.4 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.18 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.67 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.24 mg | 0.2 mg | -83.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Araka and Kabak filizi.
Kabak filizi has less energy per 100 g (19 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol), Araka has 0.13 mg and Kabak filizi has 1.44 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Araka 62, Kabak filizi 94.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.