Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
231 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Lahmacun has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
202 vs 231(+14.4%)
Score Diff
27 vs 29(+7.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Lahmacun
Higher energy
Lahmacun
Score leader
Lahmacun
Nutrient split
8 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Applebee'S, Balık, Hand Kaplı and Lahmacun are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Applebee'S, Balık, Hand Kaplı has 202.0 kcal and Lahmacun has 231.0 kcal. The difference is 29.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Applebee'S | Lahmacun | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 22 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 3 µg | 45 µg | +1400.0% |
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.48 g | — | — |
| Alanin | 0.81 g | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 1 µg | — | — |
| Alfa tokotrienol | 0.01 mg | — | — |
| Arjinin | 0.85 g | — | — |
| Aspartik asit | 1.32 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.23 µg | 0.6 µg | -51.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.2 mg | 0.15 mg | -25.0% |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 5 µg | — | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 5 µg | — | — |
| Beta tokoferol | 0.09 mg | — | — |
| Beta tokotrienol | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 8.5 mg | — |
| Delta tokoferol | 1.52 mg | — | — |
| Delta tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.35 mg | 1.8 mg | +414.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.11 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.9 g | 2.2 g | +144.4% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0.01 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.88 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 844 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 231 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Fenilalanin | 0.54 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 234 mg | 115 mg | -50.9% |
| Fruktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Galaktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Gama tokoferol | 3.72 mg | — | — |
| Gama tokotrienol | 0.05 mg | — | — |
| Glikoz | 0.51 g | — | — |
| Glisin | 0.67 g | — | — |
| Glutamik asit | 2.24 g | — | — |
| Hidroksiprolin | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Histidin | 0.33 g | — | — |
| Izolosin | 0.69 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 13 mg | 35 mg | +169.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 16.65 g | 27.4 g | +64.6% |
| Kolesterol | 34 mg | 22 mg | -35.3% |
| Kül | 2.17 g | — | — |
| Laktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lizin | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Losin | 1.15 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 100 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 20 mg | 22 mg | +10.0% |
| Maltoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| Metiyonin | 0.41 g | — | — |
| MUFA 14:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 15:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.03 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 c | 0.03 g | — | — |
| MUFA 17:1 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 1.92 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 c | 1.9 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.06 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 24:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 2.29 mg | 2.4 mg | +4.8% |
| Nisasta | 15.8 g | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 241 mg | 210 mg | -12.9% |
| Prolin | 0.69 g | — | — |
| Protein | 13.23 g | 8.5 g | -35.8% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 3.86 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 CLA | 0.01 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 n-6 c,c | 3.79 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.52 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 n-6 | 0.04 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3i | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | — | — |
| PUFA 22:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 2 µg | — | — |
| Sakkaroz | 0 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 17.8 µg | — | — |
| Serin | 0.43 g | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 15:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.02 g | — | — |
| SFA 17:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.48 g | — | — |
| SFA 20:0 | 0.03 g | — | — |
| SFA 22:0 | 0.03 g | — | — |
| SFA 24:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Sistin | 0.16 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 607 mg | 420 mg | -30.8% |
| Su | 58.82 g | 52 g | -11.6% |
| TFA 16:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| TFA 18:1 t | 0.02 g | — | — |
| TFA 18:2 t (tanımsız) | 0.05 g | — | — |
| TFA 22:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| Tirozin | 0.41 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.61 g | 3.5 g | +117.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.01 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0.08 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans-monoenoik yağ asitleri | 0.02 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans-poliinoik yağ asitleri | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 9.14 g | 9.8 g | +7.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.56 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.51 g | — | — |
| Treonin | 0.43 g | — | — |
| Triptofan | 0.14 g | — | — |
| Valin | 0.77 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.34 mg | 1.2 mg | +252.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Applebee'S, Balık, Hand Kaplı and Lahmacun.
Applebee'S has less energy per 100 g (202 kcal versus 231 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Applebee'S has 3 µg and Lahmacun has 45 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Applebee'S 27, Lahmacun 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.