Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
308 kcal
Score
33 / 100
Urfa Sıkma Peyniri has a higher nutrition quality score (33) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
292 vs 308(+5.5%)
Score Diff
32 vs 33(+3.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Urfa Sıkma Peyniri
Higher energy
Urfa Sıkma Peyniri
Score leader
Urfa Sıkma Peyniri
Nutrient split
5 - 12 (tie: 3)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Antep peyniri and Urfa Sıkma Peyniri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Antep peyniri has 292.0 kcal and Urfa Sıkma Peyniri has 308.0 kcal. The difference is 16.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 33. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Antep peyniri | Urfa Sıkma Peyniri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 195 µg | 215 µg | +10.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.45 µg | 1.45 µg | 0.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.36 mg | 0.38 mg | +5.6% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.55 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | 0.45 mg | +7.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji | 1221 kj | — | — |
| Fosfor | 450 mg | 485 mg | +7.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 680 mg | 710 mg | +4.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.8 g | 1.5 g | -16.7% |
| Kolesterol | 72 mg | 76 mg | +5.6% |
| Kül | 6.7 g | 4.8 g | -28.4% |
| Laktoz | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 28 mg | +12.0% |
| Potasyum | 115 mg | 115 mg | 0.0% |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 22.4 g | +4.2% |
| Retinol | 190 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1250 mg | 1150 mg | -8.0% |
| Su | 48 g | 47.5 g | -1.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 13.8 g | 15.3 g | +10.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.8 g | 6.4 g | +10.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 22 g | 23.8 g | +8.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.85 g | 0.9 g | +5.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 3.1 mg | -3.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Antep peyniri and Urfa Sıkma Peyniri.
Antep peyniri has less energy per 100 g (292 kcal versus 308 kcal).
For measured Kül, Antep peyniri has 6.7 g and Urfa Sıkma Peyniri has 4.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Antep peyniri 32, Urfa Sıkma Peyniri 33.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.