Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
62.5 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Ev yoğurdu has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
292 vs 62.5(-78.6%)
Score Diff
99 vs 100(+1.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ev yoğurdu
Higher energy
Antep peyniri
Score leader
Ev yoğurdu
Nutrient split
15 - 5 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Antep peyniri and Ev yoğurdu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Antep peyniri has 292.0 kcal and Ev yoğurdu has 62.5 kcal. The difference is 229.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 99 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Antep peyniri | Ev yoğurdu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 195 µg | 27 µg | -86.2% |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.45 µg | 0.37 µg | -74.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.36 mg | 0.14 mg | -61.1% |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji | 1221 kj | — | — |
| Fosfor | 450 mg | 95 mg | -78.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 680 mg | 121 mg | -82.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.8 g | 4.7 g | +161.1% |
| Kolesterol | 72 mg | 13 mg | -81.9% |
| Kül | 6.7 g | 0.75 g | -88.8% |
| Laktoz | 1.2 g | 4.2 g | +250.0% |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 12 mg | -52.0% |
| Potasyum | 115 mg | 155 mg | +34.8% |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 3.5 g | -83.7% |
| Retinol | 190 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1250 mg | 46 mg | -96.3% |
| Su | 48 g | 87.7 g | +82.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 13.8 g | 2.1 g | -84.8% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 7 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.8 g | 0.89 g | -84.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 22 g | 3.3 g | -85.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.85 g | 0.09 g | -89.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | 4.5 g | +275.0% |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 0.59 mg | -81.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Antep peyniri and Ev yoğurdu.
Ev yoğurdu has less energy per 100 g (62.5 kcal versus 292 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Antep peyniri has 1.2 g and Ev yoğurdu has 4.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Antep peyniri 99, Ev yoğurdu 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.