Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Energy
272.6 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
272.6 vs 98(-64.0%)
Score Diff
42 vs 35(-16.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Score leader
Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
12 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Ajvar are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 272.6 kcal and Ajvar has 98.0 kcal. The difference is 174.6 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 42 and 35. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Ajvar | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 78 µg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | 0.19 mg | -13.6% |
| Bakir | 0.42 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 935 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.2 mg | 62.4 mg | +1385.7% |
| Demir | 7.8 mg | 0.85 mg | -89.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.8 g | 2.6 g | +225.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.75 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 58 mg | 29 mg | -50.0% |
| Fruktoz | 28.6 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 29.4 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 245 mg | 19 mg | -92.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 66.7 g | 8.35 g | -87.5% |
| Kül | 2.8 g | 1.6 g | -42.9% |
| Magnezyum | 82 mg | 15 mg | -81.7% |
| Mangan | 0.85 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.4 mg | 0.88 mg | -37.1% |
| Potasyum | 1140 mg | 235 mg | -79.4% |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.45 g | -3.3% |
| Sakkaroz | 2.5 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 32 mg | 490 mg | +1431.3% |
| Su | 28.8 g | 81.8 g | +184.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.05 g | 0.72 g | +1340.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 21 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.85 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 5.8 g | +2800.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.95 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.5 g | 4.9 g | -91.9% |
| Çinko | 1.6 mg | 0.28 mg | -82.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Ajvar.
Ajvar has less energy per 100 g (98 kcal versus 272.6 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 0.2 g and Ajvar has 5.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Andız Pekmezi (Organik/Köy Usulü) 42, Ajvar 35.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.