Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
318 kcal
Score
68 / 100
Pul biber has a higher nutrition quality score (68) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
281 vs 318(+13.2%)
Score Diff
43 vs 68(+58.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pul biber
Higher energy
Pul biber
Score leader
Pul biber
Nutrient split
4 - 12 (tie: 3)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ancho biberi and Pul biber are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ancho biberi has 281.0 kcal and Pul biber has 318.0 kcal. The difference is 37.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 68. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ancho biberi | Pul biber | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1317 µg | 2081 µg | +58.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.33 mg | 0.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.92 mg | 0.92 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.14 mg | 2.1 mg | -1.9% |
| Bakir | — | 0.37 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 15800 µg | 21840 µg | +38.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.1 mg | 76.4 mg | +1763.4% |
| Demir | 4.13 mg | 7.8 mg | +88.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 23.1 g | 27.2 g | +17.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.82 mg | 29.8 mg | +680.1% |
| Folat DFE | 58 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 201 mg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 80.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 148 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 51.44 g | 56.63 g | +10.1% |
| Magnezyum | 88 mg | 152 mg | +72.7% |
| Mangan | — | 2 mg | — |
| Niasin | 7.8 mg | 8.7 mg | +11.5% |
| Potasyum | 2589 mg | 2014 mg | -22.2% |
| Protein | 11.86 g | 12.01 g | +1.3% |
| Sodyum | 44 mg | 30 mg | -31.8% |
| Su | 14.5 g | 10.4 g | -28.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.42 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.94 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 8.2 g | 17.27 g | +110.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 31.8 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.4 mg | 2.48 mg | +77.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ancho biberi and Pul biber.
Ancho biberi has less energy per 100 g (281 kcal versus 318 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Ancho biberi has 4.1 mg and Pul biber has 76.4 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ancho biberi 43, Pul biber 68.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.