Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
380.5 kcal
Score
60 / 100
Panch phoron has a higher nutrition quality score (60) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
281 vs 380.5(+35.4%)
Score Diff
43 vs 60(+39.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Panch phoron
Higher energy
Panch phoron
Score leader
Panch phoron
Nutrient split
8 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ancho biberi and Panch phoron are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ancho biberi has 281.0 kcal and Panch phoron has 380.5 kcal. The difference is 99.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 60. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ancho biberi | Panch phoron | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1317 µg | 32 µg | -97.6% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.38 mg | +15.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.92 mg | 0.24 mg | -73.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.14 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.95 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 15800 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.1 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 4.13 mg | 18.3 mg | +343.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 23.1 g | 12.8 g | -44.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.82 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 58 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 201 mg | 450 mg | +123.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 810 mg | +447.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 51.44 g | 38.6 g | -25.0% |
| Kül | — | 5.7 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 88 mg | 285 mg | +223.9% |
| Mangan | — | 2.1 mg | — |
| Niasin | 7.8 mg | 3.7 mg | -52.6% |
| Potasyum | 2589 mg | 1120 mg | -56.7% |
| Protein | 11.86 g | 17.4 g | +46.7% |
| Sodyum | 44 mg | 42 mg | -4.5% |
| Su | 14.5 g | 8.2 g | -43.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.42 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.94 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 8.2 g | 20.1 g | +145.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 31.8 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.4 mg | 4.8 mg | +242.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ancho biberi and Panch phoron.
Ancho biberi has less energy per 100 g (281 kcal versus 380.5 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Ancho biberi has 148 mg and Panch phoron has 810 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ancho biberi 43, Panch phoron 60.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.