Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
23 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Kişniş yaprağı has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
281 vs 23(-91.8%)
Score Diff
43 vs 100(+132.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kişniş yaprağı
Higher energy
Ancho biberi
Score leader
Kişniş yaprağı
Nutrient split
17 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ancho biberi and Kişniş yaprağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ancho biberi has 281.0 kcal and Kişniş yaprağı has 23.0 kcal. The difference is 258.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ancho biberi | Kişniş yaprağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1317 µg | 337 µg | -74.4% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.067 mg | -79.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.92 mg | 0.162 mg | -82.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.14 mg | 0.149 mg | -93.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.225 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 15800 µg | 3930 µg | -75.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.1 mg | 27 mg | +558.5% |
| Demir | 4.13 mg | 1.77 mg | -57.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 23.1 g | 2.8 g | -87.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.82 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 58 µg | 62 µg | +6.9% |
| Fosfor | 201 mg | 48 mg | -76.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 310 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 67 mg | -54.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 51.44 g | 3.67 g | -92.9% |
| Kül | — | 1.47 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 88 mg | 26 mg | -70.5% |
| Mangan | — | 0.426 mg | — |
| Niasin | 7.8 mg | 1.114 mg | -85.7% |
| Potasyum | 2589 mg | 521 mg | -79.9% |
| Protein | 11.86 g | 2.13 g | -82.0% |
| Sodyum | 44 mg | 46 mg | +4.5% |
| Su | 14.5 g | 92.21 g | +535.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.42 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.94 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 8.2 g | 0.52 g | -93.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 31.8 g | 0.87 g | -97.3% |
| Çinko | 1.4 mg | 0.5 mg | -64.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ancho biberi and Kişniş yaprağı.
Kişniş yaprağı has less energy per 100 g (23 kcal versus 281 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Ancho biberi has 4.1 mg and Kişniş yaprağı has 27 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ancho biberi 43, Kişniş yaprağı 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.