Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
48 kcal
Score
0 / 100
Ancho biberi has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
281 vs 48(-82.9%)
Score Diff
43 vs 0(-100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ancho biberi
Higher energy
Ancho biberi
Score leader
Ancho biberi
Nutrient split
12 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ancho biberi and Deniz yosunu tuzu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ancho biberi has 281.0 kcal and Deniz yosunu tuzu has 48.0 kcal. The difference is 233.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ancho biberi | Deniz yosunu tuzu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1317 µg | 45 µg | -96.6% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.92 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.14 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 15800 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.1 mg | 3.2 mg | -22.0% |
| Demir | 4.13 mg | 8.6 mg | +108.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 23.1 g | 4.5 g | -80.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.82 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 58 µg | 28 µg | -51.7% |
| Fosfor | 201 mg | 85 mg | -57.7% |
| İyot | — | 5200 µg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 16.5 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 420 mg | +183.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 51.44 g | 9.2 g | -82.1% |
| Kül | — | 79.7 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 88 mg | 540 mg | +513.6% |
| Mangan | — | 0.82 mg | — |
| Niasin | 7.8 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 2589 mg | 1850 mg | -28.5% |
| Protein | 11.86 g | 2.4 g | -79.8% |
| Selenyum | — | 12.4 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 44 mg | 31200 mg | +70809.1% |
| Su | 14.5 g | 3.8 g | -73.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.42 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.94 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 8.2 g | 0.4 g | -95.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 31.8 g | 0.3 g | -99.1% |
| Çinko | 1.4 mg | 1.25 mg | -10.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ancho biberi and Deniz yosunu tuzu.
Deniz yosunu tuzu has less energy per 100 g (48 kcal versus 281 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Ancho biberi has 44 mg and Deniz yosunu tuzu has 31200 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ancho biberi 43, Deniz yosunu tuzu 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.