Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
314 kcal
Score
59 / 100
Chipotle biberi has a higher nutrition quality score (59) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
281 vs 314(+11.7%)
Score Diff
43 vs 59(+37.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Chipotle biberi
Higher energy
Chipotle biberi
Score leader
Chipotle biberi
Nutrient split
8 - 8 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ancho biberi and Chipotle biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ancho biberi has 281.0 kcal and Chipotle biberi has 314.0 kcal. The difference is 33.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 59. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ancho biberi | Chipotle biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1317 µg | 1250 µg | -5.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.3 mg | -9.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.92 mg | 0.9 mg | -2.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.14 mg | 2.1 mg | -1.9% |
| Bakir | — | 0.4 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 15800 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.1 mg | 15 mg | +265.9% |
| Demir | 4.13 mg | 12.5 mg | +202.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 23.1 g | 28.7 g | +24.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.82 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 314 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 58 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 201 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 150 mg | +1.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 51.44 g | 55.4 g | +7.7% |
| Kül | — | 6.7 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 88 mg | 145 mg | +64.8% |
| Mangan | — | 1.8 mg | — |
| Niasin | 7.8 mg | 12.5 mg | +60.3% |
| Potasyum | 2589 mg | 1870 mg | -27.8% |
| Protein | 11.86 g | 11.2 g | -5.6% |
| Sodyum | 44 mg | 30 mg | -31.8% |
| Su | 14.5 g | 8.5 g | -41.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.42 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.94 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 8.2 g | 8.2 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 31.8 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.4 mg | 2.1 mg | +50.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ancho biberi and Chipotle biberi.
Ancho biberi has less energy per 100 g (281 kcal versus 314 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Ancho biberi has 4.1 mg and Chipotle biberi has 15 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ancho biberi 43, Chipotle biberi 59.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.