Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
318 kcal
Score
68 / 100
Pul biber has a higher nutrition quality score (68) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
337 vs 318(-5.6%)
Score Diff
66 vs 68(+3.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pul biber
Higher energy
Anason Tohumu
Score leader
Pul biber
Nutrient split
8 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Anason Tohumu and Pul biber are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Anason Tohumu has 337.0 kcal and Pul biber has 318.0 kcal. The difference is 19.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 66 and 68. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Anason Tohumu | Pul biber | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2081 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.34 mg | 0.33 mg | -2.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.29 mg | 0.92 mg | +217.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | 2.1 mg | +223.1% |
| Bakir | 0.91 mg | 0.37 mg | -59.3% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 21840 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 21 mg | 76.4 mg | +263.8% |
| Demir | 36.96 mg | 7.8 mg | -78.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 14.6 g | 27.2 g | +86.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 29.8 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 440 mg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 80.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 646 mg | 148 mg | -77.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 50.02 g | 56.63 g | +13.2% |
| Kül | 7.04 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 170 mg | 152 mg | -10.6% |
| Mangan | 2.3 mg | 2 mg | -13.0% |
| Niasin | 3.06 mg | 8.7 mg | +184.3% |
| Potasyum | 1441 mg | 2014 mg | +39.8% |
| Protein | 17.6 g | 12.01 g | -31.8% |
| Sodyum | 16 mg | 30 mg | +87.5% |
| Su | 9.54 g | 10.4 g | +9.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.59 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 10 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.78 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 15.9 g | 17.27 g | +8.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.15 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 5.3 mg | 2.48 mg | -53.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Anason Tohumu and Pul biber.
Pul biber has less energy per 100 g (318 kcal versus 337 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Anason Tohumu has 21 mg and Pul biber has 76.4 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Anason Tohumu 66, Pul biber 68.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.