Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
508 kcal
Score
45 / 100
Anason Tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (66) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
337 vs 508(+50.7%)
Score Diff
66 vs 45(-31.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Anason Tohumu
Higher energy
Kara hardal tohumu
Score leader
Anason Tohumu
Nutrient split
12 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Anason Tohumu and Kara hardal tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Anason Tohumu has 337.0 kcal and Kara hardal tohumu has 508.0 kcal. The difference is 171.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 66 and 45. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
24 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Anason Tohumu | Kara hardal tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.34 mg | 0.81 mg | +138.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.29 mg | 0.26 mg | -10.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | 0.3 mg | -53.8% |
| Bakir | 0.91 mg | 0.64 mg | -29.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 21 mg | 7.1 mg | -66.2% |
| Demir | 36.96 mg | 9.21 mg | -75.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 14.6 g | 12.2 g | -16.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 5.07 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 2125 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 508 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 440 mg | 828 mg | +88.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 646 mg | 266 mg | -58.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 50.02 g | 28.1 g | -43.8% |
| Kül | 7.04 g | 4.31 g | -38.8% |
| Magnezyum | 170 mg | 370 mg | +117.6% |
| Mangan | 2.3 mg | 2.44 mg | +6.1% |
| Niasin | 3.06 mg | 4.73 mg | +54.6% |
| Potasyum | 1441 mg | 738 mg | -48.8% |
| Protein | 17.6 g | 26.08 g | +48.2% |
| Selenyum | — | 208.1 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 16 mg | 13 mg | -18.8% |
| Su | 9.54 g | 5.27 g | -44.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.59 g | 1.96 g | +232.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 10 µg | 162 µg | +1520.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.78 g | 22.54 g | +130.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 15.9 g | 36.24 g | +127.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.15 g | 10.13 g | +221.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 6.79 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.3 mg | 6.08 mg | +14.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Anason Tohumu and Kara hardal tohumu.
Anason Tohumu has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 508 kcal).
For measured Toplam Folat, Anason Tohumu has 10 µg and Kara hardal tohumu has 162 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Anason Tohumu 66, Kara hardal tohumu 45.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.