Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
281 kcal
Score
43 / 100
Anason Tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (66) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
337 vs 281(-16.6%)
Score Diff
66 vs 43(-34.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Anason Tohumu
Higher energy
Anason Tohumu
Score leader
Anason Tohumu
Nutrient split
10 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Anason Tohumu and Ancho biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Anason Tohumu has 337.0 kcal and Ancho biberi has 281.0 kcal. The difference is 56.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 66 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Anason Tohumu | Ancho biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 1317 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.34 mg | 0.33 mg | -2.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.29 mg | 0.92 mg | +217.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | 2.14 mg | +229.2% |
| Bakir | 0.91 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 15800 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 21 mg | 4.1 mg | -80.5% |
| Demir | 36.96 mg | 4.13 mg | -88.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 14.6 g | 23.1 g | +58.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.82 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 58 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 440 mg | 201 mg | -54.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 646 mg | 148 mg | -77.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 50.02 g | 51.44 g | +2.8% |
| Kül | 7.04 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 170 mg | 88 mg | -48.2% |
| Mangan | 2.3 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 3.06 mg | 7.8 mg | +154.9% |
| Potasyum | 1441 mg | 2589 mg | +79.7% |
| Protein | 17.6 g | 11.86 g | -32.6% |
| Sodyum | 16 mg | 44 mg | +175.0% |
| Su | 9.54 g | 14.5 g | +52.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.59 g | 1.42 g | +140.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 10 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.78 g | 0.94 g | -90.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 15.9 g | 8.2 g | -48.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.15 g | 4.12 g | +30.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 31.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.3 mg | 1.4 mg | -73.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Anason Tohumu and Ancho biberi.
Ancho biberi has less energy per 100 g (281 kcal versus 337 kcal).
For measured B6 Vitamini, Anason Tohumu has 0.65 mg and Ancho biberi has 2.14 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Anason Tohumu 66, Ancho biberi 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.