Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
149.8 kcal
Score
69 / 100
Lahmacun Harcı has a higher nutrition quality score (69) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
125 vs 149.8(+19.8%)
Score Diff
26 vs 69(+165.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Lahmacun Harcı
Higher energy
Lahmacun Harcı
Score leader
Lahmacun Harcı
Nutrient split
5 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Analı kızlı and Lahmacun Harcı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Analı kızlı has 125.0 kcal and Lahmacun Harcı has 149.8 kcal. The difference is 24.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 69. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Analı kızlı | Lahmacun Harcı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 58 µg | +107.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.95 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.6 mg | 26.5 mg | +919.2% |
| Demir | 1.45 mg | 1.85 mg | +27.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 1.3 g | -43.5% |
| Fosfor | 78 mg | 112 mg | +43.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 28 mg | +16.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.2 g | 4.1 g | -71.1% |
| Kolesterol | 12 mg | 34 mg | +183.3% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Likopen | — | 3100 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 26 mg | 21 mg | -19.2% |
| Niasin | 1.65 mg | 3.1 mg | +87.9% |
| Potasyum | 220 mg | 335 mg | +52.3% |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 10.4 g | +85.7% |
| Sodyum | 325 mg | 490 mg | +50.8% |
| Su | 76.2 g | 72.2 g | -5.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.75 g | 3.9 g | +122.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 34 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.15 g | 4.3 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.1 g | 10.2 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.82 g | 0.8 g | -2.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.3 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.12 mg | 2.35 mg | +109.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Analı kızlı and Lahmacun Harcı.
Analı kızlı has less energy per 100 g (125 kcal versus 149.8 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Analı kızlı has 2.6 mg and Lahmacun Harcı has 26.5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Analı kızlı 26, Lahmacun Harcı 69.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.